How has the Stanislavski System
Influenced Contemporary Acting Practice Since The 1950's And Informed My Own
Practise?
“Every person who is really an artist desires
to create inside of himself another, deeper, more interesting life than the one
that actually surrounds him.” – An Actor Prepares, Constantin Stanislavski.
Konstantin Sergeivich Stanislavski
officially adopted the stage name Stanislavski by the year 1884, he profoundly
influenced the theatre of the 20th century and beyond. Throughout
his long life of 75 years, he developed a variety of naturalistic performance
techniques that formed a system – ‘The Stanislavski System’, also referred to
as method acting. Method acting aspires an actor to complete emotional
identification of a character. Stanislavski went on to writing many books,
which critically evaluate his career and his accomplishments in his
autobiography, ‘My Life in Art’ he speaks carefully on his early passion for
theatre. Stanislavski defied the expectations of family and social class by
becoming an actor, after enrolling in drama school, he dropped out several
weeks after. In his era the style of acting was unrealistic and over-dramatic.
This emphasises the raw idea of Stanislavski’s system, Stanislavski loathed
this style of acting because it did not truly convey human nature. Stanislavski
believed that an actor should inhabit his role and learn the details of their
characters life off stage to enhance a more three-dimensional performance.
Stanislavski co-founded the ‘Moscow Theatre’ in 1898 with Vladimir Nemirovich
Danchenko, it was highly successful and with Stanislavski’s birth right wealth
he was able to comfortably endeavour on new fields. In the era of Stalin’s
dictatorship Stanislavski’s hand was forced into reflecting the political voice
of the USSR, he was able to keep his beliefs as a follower of realism, but the
company’s work purely promoted political beliefs up until 1970. The theatre
thrived and his method of acting inspired and influenced many over renowned
drama teachers including Stella Adler.
The quote above was
taken from “An Actor Prepares”, one of the four self-written books by
Stanislavski. It highlights Stanislavski’s belief in realism and authenticity.
This quote illustrates Stanislavski’s thoughts on how he urges practitioners to
break traditions and explore their own method of acting instead on depending
purely on his system. It suggests that if one is passionate enough about the
art then they will have the skill to look further in depth within themselves to
manipulate and form a character completely different to their natural self and
take advantage of the ‘magic if’ by implementing themselves in the situation of
the character.
Stella Adler, a prodigy of Stanislavski, who trained closely with him in
his theatre group interpreted the method differently and using her own
interpretation she went on to becoming an acting lecturer herself, building a
studio in her name. Her ideology and teachings became responsible of helping to
craft one of the most memorable and legendary actors the world has ever seen.
Marlon Brando. One of the techniques that complete the Stanislavski method is ‘emotional
memory’, she considered drawing on a painful memory to create a role as
sickening. Adler granted the technique ‘given circumstances’ more useful for an
actor. She believed an actor should imagine the given circumstances of the
situation when creating a character or playing a role in comparison to
recalling moments in their personal lives. She understood the external and
internal research an actor would need to embark on to create a realistic
performance. The research would require an actor to think, how would my
character feel in this situation? What emotion would be most useful to convey
in this situation? How would my character walk? What does their voice sound
like? The actor must use the material from their research and the text to
become the character in question, Adler theorized that without doing this
research then the actor walks on the stage ‘naked’ because the actor would be
faking it.
Film acting using ‘the method’ became majorly popularized by who is
known as one of the most memorable and remarkable actors of all time. Marlon
Brando. Before Brando acting in the 1950’s was highly theatrical and
emotionally confined, and Marlon shattered fixed conventions by mastering the
Stanislavski system and leading an acting revolution. Brando is well known for
his award-winning roll as Terry Malloy from the film On the Waterfront. Adler recalled that once she instructed the class to act like chickens
and added that a nuclear bomb was about to fall on them. While most of the
students in the class ran around and clucked, he was sitting calmly and
pretended to lay an egg. When Adler asked him why he chose to react that way,
he explained, “I’m a chicken – what do I know about bombs?” This is an example of how the technique helped him develop a unique
sense of realism, he understands the truth in his role and to do anything extra
would be fake and amateur. It is eye opening to see how naturally as actors
fall into stereotypes without understand what they are being asked to portray.
From personal experience in a lesson at school, we had to do an exercise where
we had to act as if we were trying to walk through chin-high water. Everyone in
the class, including myself, lifted their head up and slowed down their pace in
walk. We never considered the circumstances of what the rest of our body is
presenting, we had to remember that the audience can still see our bodies
therefore we should show how every part of our bodies is being affected by the
circumstance. We also didn't consider that we were underwater and that if the
water is chin-high then it would be getting in our mouths. It really highlights
how much we can miss when developing a character which is why actors require
research because without research your character is not truthful.
Stanislavski’s development of naturalistic acting
explored, changed and adapted the industry forever. His work heavily influenced
the film acting from the 1950’s, which then lead to his work influencing modern
day theatre acting for example I watched a political and social issue based
devised play by Lynette Linton. The story of the play follows the under
educated knowledge a young mixed race teenage has of her dual-heritage. She
creates a YouTube channel surrounding makeup, but whilst fetishizing her tone
of skin and those that share the same light complexion as her, she denigrates
darker skin a face a huge backlash for it. However, the play also addresses
that although mixed race people have apparent privileges, they still face
racial abuse and aggression. The teens older brother attempts to pick up his fair skinned
daughter but is prevented because he is of a darker tone. Stanislavski is
implemented in this because he reacts truthfully which shows the audience he is
emotionally connected, and we therefore understand the circumstance he is in
and take on that emotion; we feel his frustration and hurt. This is effective
because we leave the show with more social awareness and knowledge.
Personally, I found it hard to use
Stanislavski’s technique of ‘Emotional memory’ which is tapping into your own
personal life, external from your character and borrowing those emotions to
create a character. To do this you must allow yourself to be vulnerable and
honest. In addition, I found no relation to the context of what my character
was going through. So instead I used the technique “Given circumstance” and “finding
the objective”. Now because I was presenting a monologue but still speaking to
someone, the monologue had to be shown in a way you could see what motivates my
reactions. Because I’m having a conversation. The monologue is quite vulgar and
angry, so I needed to understand the storyline and what happens throughout the
course of the play to see why my character (Dawta) could be so livid with her mother.
Dawta labels her mother as a Bitch, because she felt her mother allowed her
father to sexually abuse her but chose to ignore it so that she wouldn’t have
to deal with the pain it would cause her mentally and how it would tear apart her
family. Dawtas mother tries to mentally control Dawta by saying "Don't
call me that" When she should be apologising, the irony is that she feels
that she is owed respect from her daughter and is offended at the fact
that her daughter is continuously calling her a bitch throughout their
argument. It is almost as if her mum is neutral and shows no emotion or empathy
at all to Dawta and doesn't even listen to Dawta, she just wants to win.
My characters objective is to really drill it in to her Mums mind that her Mum
betrayed her, and she was hurt by it. She wants to let her Mum know how angry
she is and how she really feels about her. Sublimely all she really wants is an
apology from her Mum for not protecting her.
“When you play an evil man, look to see where he
is good. When you play an old man, look to see where he is young”.
I
whole-heartidly believe that Stanislavski’s method had a massive impact and
contribution into why acting is what it is today and how people have used this
method as a platform to tell the truth in acting. This quote is still useful
today, it illustrates that instead of portraying complex characters in an
anticipated two – dimensional way. We should use the magic if and think about
why the character is how they are. What is their back story? Every protagonist
has a flaw, so every antagonist must have a redeeming quality. Just like any
older person doesn’t have to be portrayed as if their time is almost up, they
could still be full of life an ambition just as much as a young person.